Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Rev Mal Respir ; 38(10): 993-1004, 2021 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569028

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity in daily life (PA) in patients with chronic respiratory disease is reduced. Inactivity is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality. Even though pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is associated with improved quality of life (fewer symptoms, greater exercise capacity…), its benefits with regard to PA remain unclear. STATE OF THE ART: For each patient, it is important during a respiratory rehabilitation (RR) programme to evaluate PA and its determinants. Only programs aimed at improved self-management and including educational therapy (ETP) have shown a short-term increase of PA following PR. Several studies have reported better long-term adherence when professionals help the patient to construct a personalised PA project, with regular follow-up and an array of activities (local facilities, urban walking…) chosen by the patient and adapted to the environment. PERSPECTIVES: The ongoing SARS-CoV2 pandemic has highlighted the importance of human interaction, even at a distance using information and communication technologies, as a means of sustaining patient motivation. Future controlled and randomized studies should focus on the long-term impact on PA of innovative strategies in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Moreover, it would be interesting to quantify the socioeconomic impact as well as the sustainable health benefits of the different strategies outlined in this review. CONCLUSION: It is not possible to offer a single solution likely to maintain RR benefits over an extended lapse of time. However, follow-up with an ETP and/or regular and customized support during the post-training period facilitates the long-term adoption of active behavior.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Exercise , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Quality of Life , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Rev. Mal. Respir. ; 6(37): 505-510, 20200601.
Article in English, French | WHO COVID, ELSEVIER | ID: covidwho-1386577

ABSTRACT

The French-language Respiratory Medicine Society (SPLF) proposes a guide for the follow-up of patients who have presented with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The proposals are based on known data from previous epidemics, on acute lesions observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients and on expert opinion. This guide proposes a follow-up based on three categories of patients: (1) patients managed outside hospital for possible or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred by their physician for persistent dyspnoea; (2) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in a medical unit; (3) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in an intensive care unit. The subsequent follow-up will have to be adapted to the initial assessment. This guide emphasises the possibility of others causes of dyspnoea (cardiac, thromboembolic, hyperventilation syndrome…). These proposals may evolve over time as more knowledge becomes available.

4.
Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies ; 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1269327

ABSTRACT

Severe COVID 19 infection can cause a variety of respiratory and neuro-muscular damage both in the acute phase and at distance from the initial infection. Rehabilitation should be offered at every stages of the infection. Due to a lack of evidence based data, this management is based on published data for severe respiratory infections such as SARS and expert opinion. It should combine muscle strengthening, exercise reconditioning and more specific respiratory physiotherapy for certain patients.

5.
Rev Mal Respir ; 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-274082

ABSTRACT

The French-language Respiratory Medicine Society proposes a guide for the follow-up of patients who have presented with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The proposals are based on known data from previous epidemics, on acute lesions observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients and on expert opinion. This guide proposes a follow-up based on three categories of patients: 1) patients managed outside hospital for possible or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred by their physician for persistent dyspnoea;2) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in a medical unit;3) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in an intensive care unit. The subsequent follow-up will have to be adapted to the initial assessment. This guide emphasises the possibility of others causes of dyspnoea (cardiac, thromboembolic, hyperventilation syndrome..). These proposals may evolve over time as more knowledge becomes available.

6.
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires ; 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-260298

ABSTRACT

Résumé La Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française propose un guide pour le suivi respiratoire des patients ayant présenté une pneumonie à SARS-CoV-2 à partir des données connues des précédentes épidémies, des lésions aiguës constatées chez ces patients et d’opinions d’experts. Ce guide propose une conduite à tenir selon le type de patients : 1) patient pris en charge en ville pour une infection à SARS-CoV-2 possible ou prouvée adressé par son médecin traitant pour dyspnée persistante, 2) patient hospitalisé pour pneumonie à SARS-CoV-2 en unité conventionnelle, 3) patient hospitalisé pour pneumonie à SARS-CoV-2 ayant fait un séjour en réanimation. Le suivi ultérieur sera à adapter au bilan initial. Ce guide insiste sur le fait qu’il ne faut pas méconnaitre les autres causes de dyspnée (cardiaques, thromboemboliques, syndrome d’hyperventilation, …). Ces propositions pourront évoluer dans le temps au fil des connaissances sur le sujet. The French-language Respiratory Medicine Society proposes a guide for the follow-up of patients who have presented with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The proposals are based on known data from previous epidemics, on acute lesions observed in SARS-CoV-2 patients and on expert opinion. This guide proposes a follow-up based on three categories of patients: 1) patients managed outside hospital for possible or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred by their physician for persistent dyspnoea;2) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in a medical unit;3) patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in an intensive care unit. The subsequent follow-up will have to be adapted to the initial assessment. This guide emphasises the possibility of others causes of dyspnoea (cardiac, thromboembolic, hyperventilation syndrome..). These proposals may evolve over time as more knowledge becomes available.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL